---

More than one way to see
time and how Man came
into Being!!

---

… It is now time for the Prophetic Science to be added to the list of the Human Sciences.

To the original sciences of the Humanities, History and Philosophy, the modern world has, since about 1800, added a triumvirate of subordinate studies: Political Science (Machiavelli), Sociology (Comte) and Psychology (Wundt). Evolution (Darwin) and Archeology (Rawlinson) were added to this academic structure, a bit later, as subordinates, but since they have taken on a life of their own they can now be considered their own branch of science, even though they will always be carried on the hip of mother History.

Evolution and Archeology have become the warlord sciences leading the charge trying to deny the existence of God. Still, the evolutionist and the archeologist both admit that truth is unattainable through their sciences.

Archeology by definition is always a highly speculative endeavor and therefore an atrophied and weakling science, if it can be called a science at all. The first principle of archeology being: ‘the absence of evidence does not prove that something did not happen or something does not exist.’ The archeologist is forced into selling the position that, like Sherlock Holmes, they have great powers of deductive reasoning that they are able to turn watery evidence into the wine of fact by brilliant scientific deduction. They make sure that people get the message that they have earned this power because they have worked so very hard digging in the dirt under the hot sun in some desert or dry and rocky place. But they must always admit to the persistent inquirer that their premise and conclusion is conjecture and not knowledge.

The evolutionist is on no better ground, being forced to play the same flimflam highbrow game. They declare there is no person, no intelligence behind the creation of this world or the things in it. Their first claim is that we are hereby sheer happenstance. That’s their story but they can’t just stick to it. They must try to prove it rather than describe the workings of this machinery on purely impersonal and mechanical grounds. I become skeptical when they continue to feel they have to explain themselves. They explain the mechanics of how the earth and its things came. They are like one of those dunderheaded men tinkering with a lawnmower in his garage, taking it apart and seeing how it works, then proclaiming himself a genius that understands all about it. So this brilliant goon takes apart a lawn-mower, says he has discovered how it works and therefore no intelligence was needed to make it. By learning its workings and purpose he believes that explains how it came to be. Of course, the evolutionist must back-peddle when explaining the musings and theories he engages in, puffing himself up like a bullfrog, insisting he is the discoverer of something. The evolutionists begin right away to personify, anthropomorphize, their doctrines, even though they say intelligence and personality and mind have nothing to do with creation of life. It is annoying and aggravating not only because it is untrue but it is an insult to my intelligence which they are telling me was put together by an explosion of some sort or from a primordial soup of inanimate air and rocks and.. and… stuff or … something. …

Out of a random and mindless chance selection of un-living things I came to be. With their next breath they go on to speak of these things as if that had attributes of intelligence and mind while insisting that there is no intelligence, but random luck, behind their incredibly intricate and complex nature. Then they start up again, speaking of inanimate evolution as if it had personified desires, hopes and passions, plans, strategies, as if it had a heart and mind. Then, immediately in the next breath, as if they have come to their senses, they insist that it came by an impersonal, inanimate force that cares nothing for life, but only is done by some uncaring force to do stuff. Then, in the next breath we are told about evolution as if it cared about the sunlight needs of bean sprouts, the eating habits of clams, the dangers of cancer for lizards and the composite troubles of egg whites. These anthropomorphic attributes concede to things of life only as they insist that all things have come out of dead and inanimate stuff. They are things they throw around carelessly without considering or acknowledging that they cannot honestly talk like that without agreeing that all things must begin with life. That means not only a living creator but an intelligent designer as well.

The French naturalist Georges Cuvier (1769-1832) however had shown before Darwin and the Evolutionists made their assertions that creatures on earth had been created and not evolved over time. His science was inspired, showing that old worlds had passed away in favor of new creations which gave full credence to the earth’s beginnings as indicated in the Book of Genesis.  (For an understanding of this knowledge of Creation see T Myers Smith’s: The Redemption Play: Before The Flood: Adam and Eve End of the Beginning)

But like the morons they are, they mock this axiomatic truth. They have anointed themselves scientists and tell us that things fell into a big mixer that got dropped into a spinning roulette wheel though no one can say where the wheel came from or how it got there. Their story is as credible as throwing a penny fifty feet up in the air and having it stick a perfect landing on its edge, next to a nickel on its edge – fifty thousand times in a row. They say it is only a matter of time that ‘til this would happen. They ask me to believe that it is only a matter of time before anything conceivable will happen. It is only a matter of time that the earth will become a pig, sprout wings, and become the president of the galaxy which will become a herd of winged dolphins swimming in a cotton candy universe. They say that is not what we mean, but we say, this is what must be inferred because this is what you have implied. This is why they are required to use sleight-of-hand tactics to personify inanimate things of chance, invoking the god of evolution (that they say cannot exist) to keep alive their clever ruse. Evolution is the most furtive of so-called sciences, usurping the throne of honest science, putting to shame sciences which can be duly corroborated: history, physics, astronomy, mathematics, biology, and such.

To Modern Philosophy: Salesman of Tripe

---

Back To Prophistory Explained Table of Contents